Package freenet.support.CPUInformation
Class CPUID
- java.lang.Object
-
- freenet.support.CPUInformation.CPUID
-
public class CPUID extends Object
A class for retrieveing details about the CPU using the CPUID assembly instruction. Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cpuid- Author:
- Iakin
-
-
Nested Class Summary
Nested Classes Modifier and Type Class Description protected static class
CPUID.CPUIDResult
A class that can (amongst other things I assume) represent the state of the different CPU registers after a call to the CPUID assembly method
-
Constructor Summary
Constructors Constructor Description CPUID()
-
Method Summary
All Methods Static Methods Concrete Methods Modifier and Type Method Description (package private) static int
getCPUExtendedFamily()
Only valid if family == 15.(package private) static int
getCPUExtendedModel()
Only valid if family == 15, or, for Intel only, family == 6.(package private) static int
getCPUFamily()
(package private) static int
getCPUModel()
(package private) static String
getCPUModelName()
The model name string, up to 48 characters, as reported by the processor itself.(package private) static int
getCPUStepping()
(package private) static int
getCPUType()
(package private) static String
getCPUVendorID()
(package private) static int
getECXCPUFlags()
(package private) static int
getEDXCPUFlags()
(package private) static int
getExtendedEBXFeatureFlags()
(package private) static int
getExtendedECXCPUFlags()
(package private) static int
getExtendedECXFeatureFlags()
There's almost nothing in here.(package private) static int
getExtendedEDXCPUFlags()
static CPUInfo
getInfo()
Returns a CPUInfo item for the current type of CPU If I could I would declare this method in a interface named CPUInfoProvider and implement that interface in this class.static int
getJcpuidVersion()
Return the jcpuid versionstatic void
main(String[] args)
-
-
-
Method Detail
-
getJcpuidVersion
public static int getJcpuidVersion()
Return the jcpuid version- Returns:
- 0 if no jcpuid available, 2 if version not supported
- Since:
- 0.9.26
-
getCPUVendorID
static String getCPUVendorID()
-
getCPUFamily
static int getCPUFamily()
- Returns:
- 0-15
-
getCPUModel
static int getCPUModel()
- Returns:
- 0-15
-
getCPUExtendedModel
static int getCPUExtendedModel()
Only valid if family == 15, or, for Intel only, family == 6. Left shift by 4 and then add model to get full model.- Returns:
- 0-15
-
getCPUType
static int getCPUType()
- Returns:
- 0-15
-
getCPUExtendedFamily
static int getCPUExtendedFamily()
Only valid if family == 15. Add family to get full family.- Returns:
- 0-255
-
getCPUStepping
static int getCPUStepping()
- Returns:
- 0-15
-
getEDXCPUFlags
static int getEDXCPUFlags()
-
getECXCPUFlags
static int getECXCPUFlags()
-
getExtendedECXCPUFlags
static int getExtendedECXCPUFlags()
-
getExtendedEDXCPUFlags
static int getExtendedEDXCPUFlags()
- Since:
- 0.8.7
-
getExtendedEBXFeatureFlags
static int getExtendedEBXFeatureFlags()
- Since:
- 0.9.26
-
getExtendedECXFeatureFlags
static int getExtendedECXFeatureFlags()
There's almost nothing in here.- Since:
- 0.9.26
-
getCPUModelName
static String getCPUModelName()
The model name string, up to 48 characters, as reported by the processor itself.- Returns:
- trimmed string, null if unsupported
- Since:
- 0.9.16
-
getInfo
public static CPUInfo getInfo() throws UnknownCPUException
Returns a CPUInfo item for the current type of CPU If I could I would declare this method in a interface named CPUInfoProvider and implement that interface in this class. This would make it easier for other people to understand that there is nothing preventing them from coding up new providers, probably using other detection methods than the x86-only CPUID instruction- Throws:
UnknownCPUException
-
main
public static void main(String[] args)
-
-